• Users Online: 390
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
GUEST EDITORIAL
Year : 2023  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-2

Foundations of understanding to challenge the stigma surrounding overweight, obesity, and bariatric surgery


1 Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, Helen McArdle Nursing and Care Research Institute, University of Sunderland, Sunderland SR1 3DS; Bariatric Surgical Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland SR4 7TP, United Kingdom; Faculty of Psychology, University of Anahuac, Mexico
2 Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, Helen McArdle Nursing and Care Research Institute, University of Sunderland, Sunderland SR1 3DS; Bariatric Surgical Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland SR4 7TP, United Kingdom

Date of Submission04-Jan-2023
Date of Acceptance09-Jan-2023
Date of Web Publication14-Feb-2023

Correspondence Address:
Yitka Graham
Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, Helen McArdle Nursing and Care Research Institute, University of Sunderland, Sunderland SR1 3DS; Bariatric Surgical Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland SR4 7TP

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jbs.jbs_1_23

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Graham Y, Mahawar K. Foundations of understanding to challenge the stigma surrounding overweight, obesity, and bariatric surgery. J Bariatr Surg 2023;2:1-2

How to cite this URL:
Graham Y, Mahawar K. Foundations of understanding to challenge the stigma surrounding overweight, obesity, and bariatric surgery. J Bariatr Surg [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 29];2:1-2. Available from: http://www.jbsonline.org/text.asp?2023/2/1/1/369649




  Introduction Top


Many illnesses are embedded and shaped within cultural meaning, which often influences how society responds to those living with the condition, and peoples' lived experiences.[1] The social construction of illness may not always be rooted in medical knowledge but lie within the inherent beliefs and attitudes toward the condition, which may not always be positive. For people living with overweight and obesity, there are negative connotations associated with the condition. A higher body weight is a visually apparent condition, meaning immediate value judgement are more likely in terms of assumptions and presuppositions. These attitudes can impact on a person's quality of life, and lead to stigmatization. Bariatric surgery is an intervention which is not widely understood by society, and is often perceived as a contested intervention, described as cheating, taking the easy way out, and that surgery does the work, not the patient. These value judgments of bariatric surgery can lead to further stigma, despite the person achieving often significant weight loss.[2] Understanding how overweight, obesity, and bariatric surgery are socially constructed are key to identifying and being aware of roots of surrounding stigma, and how this can be challenged to support, and reduce discrimination against those living with excess weight who undergo bariatric surgical procedures.


  Defining Stigma Top


Stigma refers to a perceived negative attribute or characteristic held by society or people, which is discrediting, shameful and devaluing toward those affected, leading to a spoiled identity, and devaluation of that group of people.[3] This is generally referred to as explicit stigma or bias where the conscious public or societal judgement of the attribute influence opinions and attitudes.[4]

Implicit stigma or bias refers to the unconscious, biased attitudes and behaviors which often occur automatically and in contrast to explicitly held beliefs and without intentional control.[5] This means these attitudes may be hidden and the person is not aware that their beliefs and attitude are potentially detrimental to those living with obesity and bariatric surgery, causing unintended harm.

Despite evidence to show that obesity is a complex health condition, with genetic, environmental and physiological factors at play,[6] society generally continues to hold people living with overweight and obesity as moral failures, accountable for their condition, with a reductionist view that people should simply eat less and exercise more. The liminal shift from individual culpability to a more complex view of obesity by society remains in statis.[7]

Evidence of the existence of obesity stigma has been present for over 50 years and increasing,[8] with societal assumptions that people living with a higher body mass are lacking in willpower, undisciplined, culpable for their weight status, lazy, and gluttonous.[9] Much of this discourse is shaped by the media, perpetuating negative stereotypes[10],[11] when in fact the media could be reinforcing the changing perceptions of obesity[7] and supporting bariatric surgery as an societally acceptable method of weight loss.

A third form of stigma, internal stigma, occurs when people living with overweight, and obesity accepts the negative weight-based attitudes and stereotypes and attribute these to themselves[12] which can influence help-seeking and lower psychological well-being.


  Impact of Stigma on People Living with Obesity and Undergoing Bariatric Surgery in Health Care Settings Top


Studies have shown that health-care professionals may hold explicit and implicit bias and stigma toward those living with overweight and obesity,[13],[14] although there is acknowledged variation in how weight bias is assessed. Within health-care settings, evidence shows weight bias is strongly related to patient–professional interactions, decisions about care, treatment compliance, and patient outcomes.[15] People living with obesity want to be listened to without fear of bias, confident of good interpersonal communication with their health-care providers.[16]


  Points of Reflection for Bariatric Surgical Teams Top


Weight stigma needs to be eradicated from health-care settings, to support people to seek help and support without fear of discrimination. Explicit and implicit stigmas need to be addressed and effort made into ensuring all health-care settings provide a context for care which accommodates and is understanding of those living with obesity. Bariatric surgical teams, with their expertise and experience, are well positioned to, and indeed should challenge stigma from both patients and other health-care professionals to demonstrate how compassionate and initiative-taking patient care can be provided in a weight-friendly, supportive environment.

As stigma is a social construct, patients may not always feel this is an appropriate issue to raise in health-care encounters. Bariatric surgical teams should consider how to ask questions in a nonjudgemental manner to raise the issue of whether potential impact of weight stigma, especially internalized, into clinical encounters, thereby legitimizing the issue of weight stigma, and honoring the individual experience, leading to a greater understanding of how stigma impacts on peoples' everyday lives.

Care and attention should be made with our patients who have undergone bariatric surgery, to inquire about any stigma or judgement relating to the intervention and offer further support to ensure positive outcomes out with the weight loss.



 
  References Top

1.
Conrad P, Barker KK. The social construction of illness: Key insights and policy implications. J Health Soc Behav 2010;51 Suppl 1:S67-79.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Graham Y, Hayes C, Small PK, Mahawar K, Ling J. Patient experiences of adjusting to life in the first 2years after bariatric surgery: A qualitative study. Clin Obes 2017;7:323-35.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin; 1963.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Phelan SM, Burgess DJ, Yeazel MW, Hellerstedt WL, Griffin JM, van Ryn M. Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity. Obes Rev 2015;16:319-26.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wyatt R, Laderman M, Botwinick K, Mate K, Whittington J. Acheiving Health equity: A Guide for Healthcare Organisations. Cambridge: Institute for Health Improvement. 2016.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Foresight. Reducing Obesity: Future Choices: Project Report. 2nd ed. London: The Stationery Office; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Stanford FC, Tauqeer Z, Kyle TK. Media and its influence on obesity. Curr Obes Rep 2018;7:186-92.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Puhl RM, Heuer CA. Obesity stigma: Important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health 2010;100:1019-28.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Puhl RM, Heuer CA. The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:941-64.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Flint SW, Hudson J, Lavallee D. The portrayal of obesity in UK national newspapers. Stigma Health 2016;1:16.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Heuer CA, McClure KJ, Puhl RM. Obesity stigma in online news: A visual content analysis. J Health Commun 2011;16:976-87.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Durso LE, Latner JD, White MA, Masheb RM, Blomquist KK, Morgan PT, et al. Internalized weight bias in obese patients with binge eating disorder: Associations with eating disturbances and psychological functioning. Int J Eat Disord 2012;45:423-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lawrence BJ, Kerr D, Pollard CM, Theophilus M, Alexander E, Haywood D, et al. Weight bias among health care professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2021;29:1802-12.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Alberga AS, Pickering BJ, Alix Hayden K, Ball GD, Edwards A, Jelinski S, et al. Weight bias reduction in health professionals: A systematic review. Clin Obes 2016;6:175-88.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hall WJ, Chapman MV, Lee KM, Merino YM, Thomas TW, Payne BK, et al. Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: A systematic review. Am J Public Health 2015;105:e60-76.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Crompvoets PI, Cramm JM, van Rossum EF, Nieboer AP. Views of patients with obesity on person-centred care: A Q-methodology study. Health Expect 2022;25:3017-26.  Back to cited text no. 16
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Introduction
Defining Stigma
Impact of Stigma...
Points of Reflec...
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2030    
    Printed211    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded185    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]